(Originally published April 18) A novel proposal to call a convention to modify California’s bloated constitution was widely supported by audience members at a panel discussion Friday, but the panelists’ reservations reflected just how difficult the reform process will be.
Convention proponent Jim Wunderman, President and CEO of the Bay Area Council, a business advocacy group, said California’s current troubles stem from the current constitution.
“We’ve all been watching this downward trend in our state’s fiscal system,” he said. “There really isn’t any good end in sight.”
The focus of Wunderman’s plan is to reform the constitution so approval of the budget does not require a two-thirds majority to pass, extend term limits for legislators, implement an open primary system and reform the tax code.
As the constitution stands now, however, only a two-thirds vote in support from the legislature can call a convention. Wunderman’s way around this is two-fold: Place a proposition on the ballot to amend the constitution allowing Californian voters to call a convention, then also have those same voters exercise their new rights and call a convention.
Speaking before an audience of about 60 people at the Pickwick Gardens in Burbank, brought together by the United Chambers of Commerce of the San Fernando Valley and Region, Wunderman acknowledged the plan was risky and complicated.
“This is a very, very big idea but we’re down, and we need to do something,” Wunderman said. “If it were a football game and it were late in the game and we’re down by six points, we’d sure want to get in a position to throw a Hail Mary. If that’s what this is, then so be it.”
California last held a constitutional convention in 1879, when the issue of the day was the rights afforded to Chinese immigrants. Since then the constitution has been amended more than 500 times.
In an interview after the convention summit had ended, Wunderman gave his proposal good odds of succeeding.
“I think they’ll be likely to do it,” he said. “There’s a lot of interest in this. People recognize that this is a crisis and it shouldn’t be wasted and that this is an opportunity for California to achieve big changes and turn this state back in a better direction and provide a government structure that would be much more workable in modern times.”
Summit attendees seemed to agree with Wunderman. Of the 29 people who completed a survey asking if they supported a constitutional convention, 24 said they did.
But those responses are a far cry from a random sampling of Californians. And while more than 400 people attended the Bay Area Council’s first meeting in Sacramento introducing the idea of a constitutional convention, Friday’s turnout was much more modest.
Panelists also raised concerns about the intricate logistics involved. Adam Summers, a policy analyst from the Reason Foundation, said he was worried seating the delegates for the convention would become a special-interest grab-bag.
State Sen. George Runner (R-Lancaster) said a constitutional convention “would never happen” and wanted to see California’s budgetary problems handled by the legislature.
“I think everything is done better in a smaller fight,” he said.
Joel Fox, president of the Small Business Action Committee and the strongest opponent of the proposal, had concerns about the planning needed. In an interview after the panel wrapped up he questioned the feasibility of even educating enough voters about the idea of a convention.
“I think it’s got a long haul to try and be successful because there’s a lot of education process to take place for people to understand what the constitutional convention is all about,” he said. “And then you have to convince them to go through with it.”
The Bay Area Council hopes to get the convention questions on the November 2010 ballot. This will require signatures from almost 700,000 registered voters. Wunderman said the Council will start holding more general interest meetings throughout the state to begin gathering support.
But even those who think the plan is unlikely, like United Chambers Chairman Stephen Holzer, admit the state is in uncharted waters where anything might happen.
“If things get bad enough then there will be a good chance,” he said. “I have a hard time seeing how things will get that bad, but who knows? We didn’t think things would get this bad.”